When Should you Carry Out OT Asset Discovery?

OT asset discovery is most effective when it is done at the right moment, not treated as a one-off technical exercise. In operational environments, timing determines whether discovery supports good decisions or simply produces an incomplete snapshot.

This article explains when OT asset discovery should be carried out, the typical triggers that prompt it, and the risks of delaying it. It also clarifies how discovery fits into wider risk and compliance activities.

What OT asset discovery is meant to support

OT asset discovery exists to create clarity. It identifies what devices, systems, and connections exist within an operational environment, how they communicate, and where responsibility sits.

In practice, discovery underpins almost every other OT security activity. Risk assessments, vulnerability management, network segmentation, and compliance reporting all depend on having an accurate view of assets. Without that foundation, later work is based on assumptions.

In real OT environments, asset information is often fragmented across drawings, spreadsheets, and informal knowledge, making discovery a necessary starting point rather than an optional step.

Typical triggers for OT asset discovery

While discovery should be planned, it is often prompted by specific events or requirements.

Starting an OT security programme

OT asset discovery should be one of the first activities when establishing an OT security programme. At this stage, organisations are defining scope, priorities, and governance.

Without discovery, it is difficult to determine which systems are in scope, which risks are most relevant, or where effort should be focused. Starting security work before understanding the asset landscape often leads to misaligned controls or gaps.

It is common to see security programmes stall early because asset visibility was assumed rather than verified.

Before a risk assessment

Risk assessments rely on knowing what assets exist, how critical they are, and how they are connected. Carrying out discovery beforehand ensures the assessment reflects the real environment.

If discovery is skipped or outdated, risk assessments tend to focus only on known or documented systems. Less visible devices, temporary connections, or legacy equipment are frequently overlooked.

In operational settings, these overlooked assets often carry disproportionate risk due to age, configuration, or lack of ownership.

Ahead of compliance audits

Many OT-related standards and regulations require evidence of asset management, system boundaries, and security controls. OT asset discovery provides the factual basis for this evidence.

Conducting discovery before an audit allows time to validate asset lists, clarify ownership, and correct inaccuracies. Leaving discovery until an audit is imminent increases the likelihood of rushed data collection and inconsistencies.

Auditors typically look for confidence and traceability rather than perfect inventories, both of which depend on discovery being done early enough to be reviewed.

After incidents, mergers, or site changes

Significant changes to the environment are strong signals that discovery should be revisited.

Security incidents can expose unknown assets or unexpected connections. Mergers and acquisitions often introduce inherited systems with limited documentation. Site expansions, upgrades, or vendor changes can quietly alter network boundaries.

Observed patterns show that post-change discovery often reveals assets that were never formally recorded, even in environments believed to be stable.

Why timing matters

OT environments change gradually, often without a single clear moment of transformation. Because of this, asset information degrades over time if it is not actively refreshed.

Early discovery supports planning and prioritisation. Late discovery tends to become reactive, uncovering issues only after decisions have already been made. This difference affects not just security outcomes, but operational confidence.

Timing also affects safety and availability. Discovery carried out in a planned window can use appropriate methods and controls. Discovery triggered under pressure may introduce unnecessary risk or operational disruption.

Risks of delaying OT asset discovery

Delaying discovery does not simply postpone visibility. It introduces specific risks that accumulate over time.

Unknown or unmanaged assets are more likely to fall outside patching, monitoring, and access control processes. Network changes made without full visibility can unintentionally expose critical systems. Risk assessments conducted on incomplete data may underestimate exposure or misclassify criticality.

In many environments, undocumented assets remain invisible until they fail, are exploited, or are flagged during an audit. At that point, discovery becomes a corrective exercise rather than a preventative one.

Discovery as a bridge to risk and compliance

OT asset discovery is not an end in itself. Its primary role is to support informed risk management and credible compliance.

When discovery is carried out at the right time, it enables risk assessments to be grounded in reality and compliance activities to be evidence-based. When it is delayed, both risk and compliance efforts become less reliable.

Treating discovery as a foundational, recurring activity rather than a one-off task helps ensure that security, safety, and compliance decisions are made with an accurate understanding of the operational environment.

All OT Asset Discovery Articles